Reasons to question what we are told

One of the things which is implied in the scriptures and which we see happening now is that they’re going to use global chaos and fear to create a spirit in people in which they’re going to accept the demands of a coming Antichrist government.

People can become afraid, and they’re going to do what the government tells them to do. The climate conference is just another example of that taking place.

What’s the spirit behind it?

I’ve said we’ve got all kinds of apocalyptic statements coming out, warning of a coming destruction. I’ve told you one from Boris Johnson: “We’re at one minute to midnight”.

‘A vast military-style campaign with trillions at its disposal, otherwise we’re going to fry and be doomed’, that’s what they’re telling us. And Prince Charles is in with the World Economic Foundation and all the people who are behind.

And the statements from the U.N. Secretary General. the Pope, the Archbishop of Canterbury all saying pretty much the same thing.

You’ve got the BBC, the mass, mainstream media turning this message over and over again and almost nothing else.

This is what I got off the BBC website:

 •     Governments must promise more ambitious cuts in warming gases if we are to prevent greater global temperature rises.

•      The summit in Glasgow is where change must happen.  The world’s biggest polluters must commit to reduce and ultimately eliminate carbon burning in order to save the world.

•      All our lives must change. Decisions made here will impact our jobs, how we heat our homes, what we eat and how we travel.

Note the word ‘must’ here. There’s a compulsion which is being put upon us because the majority of climate scientists predict catastrophic 3 to 4 degrees centigrade rise in global temperatures.

Unless we do this, humanity and much of the planet, they’re telling us, is doomed.

Therefore, you’ve got to cut back the use of fossil fuels in order to survive or die. It really is an apocalyptic doomsday message: ‘one minute to midnight’.

They also say that this message has a warning and a hope. The hope is that, if they get it right, then we’ll be okay.

What do you think? Is it right?

I want to say, first of all, that I understand a lot about the environment situation. In Genesis 1, it says that God gave mankind the responsibility to look after the earth under His control.

He gave us the creation mandate. It was lost because of (Genesis 3) the fall of man, but essentially, human beings were put on the earth by God in order to look after the earth as the highest element of His creation.

I also agree that we shouldn’t be dumping plastic in the sea, we shouldn’t be burning down forests, we should be recycling waste. I agree that coal is a problem in terms of the atmosphere.

However, there is an agenda which I don’t agree with and the agenda which you need to be aware of in this whole situation concerning what they call ‘anthropomorphic global warming’, in other words, man-made global warming.

There are reasons why we do question some of the things which we are being told.

Boris Johnson said that the reason for the problem is quote:

That’s what he said last week. In 2015, he actually rubbished that statement, but he has been converted in the meantime to climate change agenda.

It’s the central idea of the climate change agenda, in other words, by burning fossil fuels the human race is creating a heat blanket over the earth which causes heat to be reflected back to the earth and raises temperatures.

Do you get the picture?

The more we burn, the thicker the blanket becomes and the higher the temperature goes. The only solution there is for us is to cut back and eventually eliminate the burning of fossil fuels so that the heat can escape into the atmosphere. It’s what we’re told all the time, on the BBC, in the education system and so on, by the scientists.

A little booklet I have here (I’ve only got one copy left unfortunately but I can get some more if you want them) is very scientific and, if you’re not scientific, you might find it difficult to follow. It’s called ‘Climate change: what we know and what we don’t know’. It’s a lecture by a man called Professor Murry Salby written by Mike Schaller and it questions that whole agenda. It says it’s without foundation in science. It says that the climate is much more complex than that.

I’ve also got about 150 pages of articles on my computer showing the flaws in the theory which I could send you by email.

The climate is immensely complex. It is affected by the sun, the ocean currents, the wind direction, and cloud cover. There are many things which we can’t affect also.

At the present time, we’re seeing an absence of sunspots which causes a weakening of the sun and affects the jet stream wind direction, and ultimately is going to create global cooling.

Additionally, there’s a change in what we call the El Niño and La Niña currents in the Pacific Ocean. El Niño is when the warm water is on the surface. It’s now being transformed to La Niña where cold water remains on the surface. Both of those phenomena are going to cause colder weather and global cooling.

If you follow the global warming propaganda, they never mention anything about this. But the fact is that, in fact, the temperature currently is flat-lining, and some are saying it’s going to go colder.

Last winter, in both the Northern and the Southern Hemispheres, the temperatures were very much colder than usual. There were above-average amounts of snow, Antarctica had its coldest weather ever recorded in the Southern winter just gone.

They don’t tell you that on the BBC, and they don’t tell you that in much of what you’re hearing. In fact, already this winter, in the Northern Hemisphere, I’ve read that the areas in the far North, in Alaska, Siberia, North of Scandinavia had unusually cold weather, with unusually high levels of snow.

There have been large amounts of snow falling on the Alps, in the Himalayas, and in the Rocky Mountains in America, above average for this time of year.

And someone is projecting that the temperature was going to go down which would be embarrassing for the global warming lobby but say that they’ll somehow manage to blame that too on global warming anyway.

The fact is that this is not the kind of computer-models which they’re given, on which a lot of this agenda is based and these are not working out accurately what’s really happening.

Melanie Phillips (does anyone know Melinda Phillips?), she’s a journalist. She says a lot of sensible things. She wrote an article where she said,

A man called Chris Morrison’s quote says:

In other words, the forecasts have been wrong.

Do you remember Al Gore’s film ‘The inconvenient truth’? It said that there would be no more ice in the Arctic today, that you won’t see snow again. Well, there’s growing ice in the Arctic, it hasn’t gone away.

“It’s in total contradiction to the core belief that rising CO2 levels inevitably, inescapably drive global temperatures upward. Satellite and surface measurements show that there has been no global warming for seven years.”

“Then, how do the journalists and so on kind of explain that out? They say that such claims are based on extreme weather, what we used to call bad weather.”

It says that “… heat, cold, rain or drought, everything, everyone is a winner, and this is used by the media to prove global warming.

Of course, cherry-picking individual weather events and blaming it on long-term changes in the climate is about as unscientific as you can get, and not a scintilla of credible proof has yet been produced to back up the claims.”

“We don’t know for certain that humans call or cause all of most or most global warming by burning fossil fuels, but it seems highly unlikely.

From around 1945 to the late 1970s, there was a fall in global temperatures and an almost unanimous fear about global cooling. Then, the temperature rose for 20 years, leading to the settled science of global warming.”

“Now it’s flattening and possibly heading in the direction of cooling so, ‘Armageddon’ beckons with extreme weather. Is CO2 to blame when humans only contribute 3% of all CO2 entering the atmosphere.”

If we destroy our industrial way of lifestyle by cutting our modest contribution, can we be sure the other 97% will behave itself in a world that is naturally warming a little as it has done countless times in the past?”

“On the basis of an uncertain hypothesis which has become an argument-free agenda you are not allowed to question for most members of the mainstream media, politicians, activists, state-sponsored scientists and subsidy-hungry industrialists, we are embarking on net zero with little idea, or seemingly care, of the disastrous effect it will have on human society across the globe.”

“Almost every new technology to replace our existing cheap and reliable power has severe disadvantages and heavy costs. The warnings of green disaster have long been evident. In 2018 the long-established Institution of Engineers and Shipbuilders in Scotland warned that the Scottish and UK Government green energy policy was likely to lead to severe electricity blackouts. Such events, it warned, ‘lead to death, severe societal and industrial disruption, civil disturbance and loss of production’.”

“Few know about all the many distinguished scientists who say that the man-made global warming theory is false because no mainstream outlets will give them a platform. In 2006, the BBC decided to stop giving any airtime to climate change sceptics. The BBC is now no more than a propaganda outfit for the climate change cult.”

And it seems that this is a pattern in other areas as well, that certain opinions which go against what they want you to see are just screened out of the media. They want to get it out of social media, they want to stop people preaching about it in churches, like me.

And you’re going to see that this pressure to suppress any view which go against the mainstream. Yet, there are reasons why you should question some of the stuff that’s going on.